Technical means as sources of evidence in cases of administrative offenses: under the prism of observing human rights and freedoms

The article is devoted to the study of legal regulation use technical means related implementation video recording, photography and filming by subjects public administration, in particular, those authorized draw up protocols on administrative offenses officials. research carried out basis strict observance human rights freedoms, as fundamental principles civil society a democratic state, which should determine powers, their use, therefore behavior administration during videography, filmmaking. It argued that no socially significant goal may be for limiting or depriving person his her including right privacy, any form. reasoned relevant delict proceedings has number features imperatives, violation leads inadmissibility evidence. In it emphasized installation surveillance systems (public) places must necessarily accompanied appropriate posters, informational signs indicating filming, preservation accumulation such information about possibility using purposes with purpose.
 obvious fixation (static – photography, dynamic film shooting, without sound recording) direct interference person’s private life. As result, possible only grounds provided law. key condition photo recording warn turn involves giving latter’s consent filming. used are great importance, latter certified, calibrated have received permits, sanitary hygienic, Ukraine been transferred specific officials, well (they undergone training) specified officials regarding means, use.